1. fast-safe-stringify
Safely and quickly serialize JavaScript objects
fast-safe-stringify
Package: fast-safe-stringify
Created by: davidmarkclements
Last modified: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:37:27 GMT
Version: 2.1.1
License: MIT
Downloads: 50,534,414
Repository: https://github.com/davidmarkclements/fast-safe-stringify

Install

npm install fast-safe-stringify
yarn add fast-safe-stringify

fast-safe-stringify

Safe and fast serialization alternative to JSON.stringify.

Gracefully handles circular structures instead of throwing in most cases.
It could return an error string if the circular object is too complex to analyze,
e.g. in case there are proxies involved.

Provides a deterministic ("stable") version as well that will also gracefully
handle circular structures. See the example below for further information.

Usage

The same as JSON.stringify.

stringify(value[, replacer[, space[, options]]])

 const safeStringify = require('fast-safe-stringify')
const o = { a: 1 }
o.o = o

console.log(safeStringify(o))
// '{"a":1,"o":"[Circular]"}'
console.log(JSON.stringify(o))
// TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON

function replacer(key, value) {
  console.log('Key:', JSON.stringify(key), 'Value:', JSON.stringify(value))
  // Remove the circular structure
  if (value === '[Circular]') {
    return
  }
  return value
}

// those are also defaults limits when no options object is passed into safeStringify
// configure it to lower the limit.
const options = {
  depthLimit: Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER,
  edgesLimit: Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER
};

const serialized = safeStringify(o, replacer, 2, options)
// Key: "" Value: {"a":1,"o":"[Circular]"}
// Key: "a" Value: 1
// Key: "o" Value: "[Circular]"
console.log(serialized)
// {
//  "a": 1
// }

Using the deterministic version also works the same:

 const safeStringify = require('fast-safe-stringify')
const o = { b: 1, a: 0 }
o.o = o

console.log(safeStringify(o))
// '{"b":1,"a":0,"o":"[Circular]"}'
console.log(safeStringify.stableStringify(o))
// '{"a":0,"b":1,"o":"[Circular]"}'
console.log(JSON.stringify(o))
// TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON

A faster and side-effect free implementation is available in the
[safe-stable-stringify][] module. However it is still considered experimental
due to a new and more complex implementation.

Replace strings constants

  • [Circular] - when same reference is found
  • [...] - when some limit from options object is reached

Differences to JSON.stringify

In general the behavior is identical to JSON.stringify. The replacer
and space options are also available.

A few exceptions exist to JSON.stringify while using toJSON or
replacer:

Regular safe stringify

  • Manipulating a circular structure of the passed in value in a toJSON or the
    replacer is not possible! It is possible for any other value and property.

  • In case a circular structure is detected and the replacer is used it
    will receive the string [Circular] as the argument instead of the circular
    object itself.

Deterministic ("stable") safe stringify

  • Manipulating the input object either in a toJSON or the replacer
    function will not have any effect on the output. The output entirely relies on
    the shape the input value had at the point passed to the stringify function!

  • In case a circular structure is detected and the replacer is used it
    will receive the string [Circular] as the argument instead of the circular
    object itself.

A side effect free variation without these limitations can be found as well
(safe-stable-stringify). It is also faster than the current
implementation. It is still considered experimental due to a new and more
complex implementation.

Benchmarks

Although not JSON, the Node.js util.inspect method can be used for similar
purposes (e.g. logging) and also handles circular references.

Here we compare fast-safe-stringify with some alternatives:
(Lenovo T450s with a i7-5600U CPU using Node.js 8.9.4)

 fast-safe-stringify:   simple object x 1,121,497 ops/sec ±0.75% (97 runs sampled)
fast-safe-stringify:   circular      x 560,126 ops/sec ±0.64% (96 runs sampled)
fast-safe-stringify:   deep          x 32,472 ops/sec ±0.57% (95 runs sampled)
fast-safe-stringify:   deep circular x 32,513 ops/sec ±0.80% (92 runs sampled)

util.inspect:          simple object x 272,837 ops/sec ±1.48% (90 runs sampled)
util.inspect:          circular      x 116,896 ops/sec ±1.19% (95 runs sampled)
util.inspect:          deep          x 19,382 ops/sec ±0.66% (92 runs sampled)
util.inspect:          deep circular x 18,717 ops/sec ±0.63% (96 runs sampled)

json-stringify-safe:   simple object x 233,621 ops/sec ±0.97% (94 runs sampled)
json-stringify-safe:   circular      x 110,409 ops/sec ±1.85% (95 runs sampled)
json-stringify-safe:   deep          x 8,705 ops/sec ±0.87% (96 runs sampled)
json-stringify-safe:   deep circular x 8,336 ops/sec ±2.20% (93 runs sampled)

For stable stringify comparisons, see the performance benchmarks in the
safe-stable-stringify readme.

Protip

Whether fast-safe-stringify or alternatives are used: if the use case
consists of deeply nested objects without circular references the following
pattern will give best results.
Shallow or one level nested objects on the other hand will slow down with it.
It is entirely dependant on the use case.

 const stringify = require('fast-safe-stringify')

function tryJSONStringify (obj) {
  try { return JSON.stringify(obj) } catch (_) {}
}

const serializedString = tryJSONStringify(deep) || stringify(deep)

Acknowledgements

Sponsored by nearForm

License

MIT

RELATED POST

10 Must-Know Windows Shortcuts That Will Save You Time

10 Must-Know Windows Shortcuts That Will Save You Time

Arrays vs Linked Lists: Which is Better for Memory Management in Data Structures?

Arrays vs Linked Lists: Which is Better for Memory Management in Data Structures?

Navigating AWS Networking: Essential Hacks for Smooth Operation

Navigating AWS Networking: Essential Hacks for Smooth Operation

Achieving Stunning Visuals with Unity's Global Illumination

Achieving Stunning Visuals with Unity's Global Illumination

Nim's Hidden Gems: Lesser-known Features for Writing Efficient Code

Nim's Hidden Gems: Lesser-known Features for Writing Efficient Code